got along just "peachy keen" for thousands of years working with
the Magnificent Seven:
are plenty of differing theories as to why particular zodiacal signs
were assigned to the different members of the Magnificent Seven. So
go ahead and take your pick....
then one day... with the discovery of three new planets (Uranus, Neptune,
and Pluto) over the past three hundred years, three of the zodiacal
signs (Aquarius, Pisces, and Scorpio) received shiny, new ruling planets.
like the shiny, new ruling planets that Aquarius, Pisces, and Scorpio
were assigned to. I
like them a lot! But
I also still like the Magnificent Seven assignments.
I'm caught in a quandary... caught
betwixt and between a rock and a hard place...
I skillfully maneuver between the horns of my astrological dilemma
by paying attention to both the traditional and the modern rulers
of these three signs.
Fill 'er Up!
thing we moderns like to do is fill up our charts with lots and lots
and lots and lots of planets, comets, asteroids, and various "sensitive
points." The astrological chart is becoming more and more crowded
with each and every passing day.
like and consistently use the outer planets of Uranus, Neptune, and
Pluto - and I (occasionally) use some of the comets, asteroids, and
various "sensitive points."
sometimes I have to (temporarily) clear out all the "Johnny come
order to give the original Magnificent Seven a little elbow room and
breathing space. Sometimes, less is more.